Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41561 - 41570 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 41561 - 41570 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
lost if Summers did not react immediately. Finally, the State claims that the detailed description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
lost if Summers did not react immediately. Finally, the State claims that the detailed description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. (Citation and footnote omitted.) The sentencing court also rejected Graham’s untimely claim that it had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
. (Citation and footnote omitted.) The sentencing court also rejected Graham’s untimely claim that it had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. ADMIN. CODE § PAC 1.06(16) (Dec. 2010). Specifically, it determined that Vela’s claim failed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929301 - 2025-03-19
. ADMIN. CODE § PAC 1.06(16) (Dec. 2010). Specifically, it determined that Vela’s claim failed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929301 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Wegner
it sentenced him after probation revocation. Wegner claims that the trial court: (1) failed to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
it sentenced him after probation revocation. Wegner claims that the trial court: (1) failed to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
of the subrogor's claim without the subrogor having agreed to accept the reduced amount. This court determined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
of the subrogor's claim without the subrogor having agreed to accept the reduced amount. This court determined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the sentencing hearing in case No. 2004-CF-19, which he claims shows that Judge Cameron held that the fines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
of the sentencing hearing in case No. 2004-CF-19, which he claims shows that Judge Cameron held that the fines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
in the two businesses, should have disallowed the business expenses and depreciation claimed for Lynn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41259 - 2009-09-21
in the two businesses, should have disallowed the business expenses and depreciation claimed for Lynn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41259 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the State misstated the evidence in its closing argument. ¶8 To succeed on a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
the State misstated the evidence in its closing argument. ¶8 To succeed on a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Latasha J.
-termination motion seeking to vacate the default entered against her. Latasha claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6059 - 2017-09-19
-termination motion seeking to vacate the default entered against her. Latasha claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6059 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and (2) failed to dispute the State’s assertion that Waterman’s BAC was .286. We disagree. A claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21
; and (2) failed to dispute the State’s assertion that Waterman’s BAC was .286. We disagree. A claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21