Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 16410 for commenting.

[PDF] NOTICE
will address each contention in turn. ¶13 First, we agree that the trial court’s comment that it accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57060 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rule Order
administrative rules conference on January 22, 2013, and voted to solicit public comment. Written comments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158244 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
two of the judgment of conviction in Case No. 2015CF1757 includes in the comments for Count 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655526 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concludes that this issue lacks arguable merit. The report asserts that the prosecutor properly commented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286184 - 2020-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it based on what Mr. Thomas says. ¶15 Based on these comments, particularly the contrast between trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as reported in the PSI report. The sentencing court’s comments acknowledged that Thomas would only be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104165 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 41
their argument by laying out what they claim are the elements of their case. Relying on a comment to WIS JI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rule Order
administrative rules conference on January 22, 2013, and voted to solicit public comment. Written comments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158244 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court denied the motion, commenting that Watling’s conduct was sexually-motivated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53106 - 2010-08-10

COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784. ¶12 At the outset of its sentencing comments, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71143 - 2011-09-20