Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 33847 for dismissed.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 33847 for dismissed.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Henderson appeals an order dismissing his petition for a temporary restraining order. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48252 - 2014-09-15
Henderson appeals an order dismissing his petition for a temporary restraining order. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48252 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Attorney O’Connell moves for dismissal of the appeal so he may file an additional postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101054 - 2017-09-21
Attorney O’Connell moves for dismissal of the appeal so he may file an additional postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101054 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed. ¶1 PER CURIAM Petitioner, Kenneth L. Moucha (Moucha), requests
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17327 - 2005-03-31
of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed. ¶1 PER CURIAM Petitioner, Kenneth L. Moucha (Moucha), requests
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supporting plea withdrawal. Acting on counsel’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the no-merit appeal, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241649 - 2019-06-03
supporting plea withdrawal. Acting on counsel’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the no-merit appeal, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241649 - 2019-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1461-CRNM 2 motion seeking SAP eligibility in this matter. Counsel moves to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993401 - 2025-08-07
. No. 2023AP1461-CRNM 2 motion seeking SAP eligibility in this matter. Counsel moves to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993401 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was improvidently docketed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for the reasons noted below. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954603 - 2025-05-13
was improvidently docketed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for the reasons noted below. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954603 - 2025-05-13
State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
, as a repeater, on July 23, 1992. On November 30, 1992, the trial court granted the State's motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
, as a repeater, on July 23, 1992. On November 30, 1992, the trial court granted the State's motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
Judy Hagner v. State of Wisconsin Appeals Commissioners - Musolf
order dismissing her action against the Tax Appeals Commission, Tax Appeals Commissioner Mark Musolf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2866 - 2005-03-31
order dismissing her action against the Tax Appeals Commission, Tax Appeals Commissioner Mark Musolf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2866 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] no-merit report, dismiss this appeal and reinstate the time for filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102136 - 2013-09-16
. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] no-merit report, dismiss this appeal and reinstate the time for filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102136 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
the State's motion to dismiss because the State was unable to locate an important witness. Six months later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8356 - 2017-09-19
the State's motion to dismiss because the State was unable to locate an important witness. Six months later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8356 - 2017-09-19