Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 46818 for shows.

William E. Jensen v. Susan E. Jensen
characterizes as inconsistent factual findings. He contends finding of fact number 18 shows the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18305 - 2005-05-25

[PDF] William E. Jensen v. Susan E. Jensen
factual findings. He contends finding of fact number 18 shows the circuit court intended to deduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18305 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Philip O. Rose
of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13525 - 2017-09-21

State v. Clifton L. Watts
not testify. To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, defendants must show that counsel's performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
possible defenses. To be entitled to a hearing, Svea’s motion (as supplemented by his letter) must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124663 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
follows. A circuit court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133147 - 2015-01-20

Thomas P. Reitz v. Acres of America, Inc.
was president of Acres of America and Nowak was the real estate agent who showed the property to the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8691 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel, a defendant must show that his lawyer performed deficiently and that this deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144348 - 2015-07-13

Dale P.A. v. Becky W.P.
to show that the child is in immediate danger of life, health or safety and it is not necessary to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10811 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that counsel’s errors were prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05