Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 20874 for word.

Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
misinterpreted the legislature's use of the word "held." It argues that "held" was inserted by the legislature
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16681 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514466 - 2022-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=at+least) (defining the idiom, “at least”). This is in contrast to a phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246210 - 2019-09-05

State v. Charles Hoecherl
the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror” during voir dire. State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13326 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
certain words to indicate they are defined terms. We have omitted the emphasis to avoid a suggestion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241515 - 2019-07-30

[PDF] Tri-Tech Corporation of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.
Schmidt contends that the word “improvements” as it exists in the theft by contractor statute, is a term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3311 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Peter Kiss v. General Motors Corporation
first observe that the plain language of the statute does not define the word “comparable.” We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2347 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
, we must interpret the word "require," keeping in mind that "[t]he goal of rule interpretation, like
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17448 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles Hoecherl
the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror” during voir dire. State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13325 - 2005-03-31

State v. Heriberto Castillo, Jr.
was never released. Furthermore, the language the State omitted after the word “revoked” states, “[H]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9195 - 2005-03-31