Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41601 - 41610 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.

COURT OF APPEALS
contends he had notice and an opportunity to rebut the City’s claims. The circuit court came to a similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59439 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] State v. Trederick Nelson
and disorderly conduct. He first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence by claiming that the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brent L. Miller
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15991 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted to accept five cases at its March 13, 2025 conference
" pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 426.110(4)(c), both moots such aggrieved party's individual claim and precludes
/supreme/docs/0325cal.pdf - 2025-04-04

[PDF] Amended Rules Petition 05-05
other claims in regard to a will dispute. However, that party was allowed to back out because
/supreme/docs/0505petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2015
was entered, which provided that Abbey Springs, and all persons claiming under it, were barred
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154154 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December 2016
discretion when it ignored the bank’s unexplained three-year delay in in asserting its jury waiver claim
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180547 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senators to April 2, 2024 Court Order
claims at issue here, nor could there be. See Clarke v. Wis. Elec- tions Comm’n, 2023 WI 70, --- Wis. 2d
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0409wilegisrepsens.pdf - 2024-04-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. That statute provides, in relevant part, that any person claiming the right to possession of such property
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694036 - 2023-08-23

State v. Encarnacion F.
argues that the evidence should have been suppressed on three grounds. First, he claims he was stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14501 - 2005-03-31