Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41601 - 41610 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 41601 - 41610 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
in the Town of Seneca on Rusk Road. A search of the entire record reveals no evidence or circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12919 - 2005-03-31
in the Town of Seneca on Rusk Road. A search of the entire record reveals no evidence or circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12919 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the record of the existence of such prior outstanding claim, including notice, actual or constructive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
the record of the existence of such prior outstanding claim, including notice, actual or constructive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
State v. Michael H.
parental responsibility. See id. at 675. Rob had argued that “the record does not support by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2348 - 2005-03-31
parental responsibility. See id. at 675. Rob had argued that “the record does not support by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2348 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Contardi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
record in this case, the Court hereby concludes and orders as follows: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6806 - 2005-03-31
record in this case, the Court hereby concludes and orders as follows: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6806 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allen D. Mechtel
intentionally gave false information about a recorded telephone conversation between the police informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
intentionally gave false information about a recorded telephone conversation between the police informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the judgment”; or (2) the record of the case will be evidence for or against the witness in a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31184 - 2014-09-15
of the judgment”; or (2) the record of the case will be evidence for or against the witness in a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31184 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jermaine Jones
. The trial court determined that the record did not support the latter allegation and that it was the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8191 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court determined that the record did not support the latter allegation and that it was the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
stated its reasoning and determination on the record. I guess here’s the way that I, as a non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33068 - 2014-09-15
stated its reasoning and determination on the record. I guess here’s the way that I, as a non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
the plea unless the defendant waives the issue on the record. That is not a function within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15352 - 2017-09-21
the plea unless the defendant waives the issue on the record. That is not a function within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15352 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of obstructing arose from a domestic call for assistance, and Luckett’s criminal record demonstrates domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49006 - 2014-09-15
of obstructing arose from a domestic call for assistance, and Luckett’s criminal record demonstrates domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49006 - 2014-09-15