Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41631 - 41640 of 45816 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 41631 - 41640 of 45816 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - May 2007
were so severe as to prevent him from driving, but recommended further testing. Midwest consulted
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28819 - 2014-09-15
were so severe as to prevent him from driving, but recommended further testing. Midwest consulted
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28819 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John S. Provo
of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. Id. ¶8 Provo’s lead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. Id. ¶8 Provo’s lead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dawn M. Champion
factor test. ¶6 Champion acknowledges that, prior to truth-in-sentencing, her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4181 - 2005-03-31
factor test. ¶6 Champion acknowledges that, prior to truth-in-sentencing, her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4181 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P.
and urges us to affirm. According to the “harmless error” test, we may grant the State's request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
and urges us to affirm. According to the “harmless error” test, we may grant the State's request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
effecting the true intent of the parties and the extent of policy coverage. The test “is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
effecting the true intent of the parties and the extent of policy coverage. The test “is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 In order to prove an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must satisfy a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21
. ¶12 In order to prove an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must satisfy a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by an objective test, not a subjective one. So, regardless of defense counsel’s thought process, if counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852047 - 2024-09-19
by an objective test, not a subjective one. So, regardless of defense counsel’s thought process, if counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852047 - 2024-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. “[T]he test for whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169768 - 2017-09-21
. See Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. “[T]he test for whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gregory R. Bloom
. App. 1993). The prejudice prong is not an outcome determinative test. See State v. Scott, 230 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6575 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1993). The prejudice prong is not an outcome determinative test. See State v. Scott, 230 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6575 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Raquel R. S. and K.B. v. Necedah Area School District
not explain what particular act the circumstances known to Jorandby compelled her to do, which is the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5037 - 2017-09-19
not explain what particular act the circumstances known to Jorandby compelled her to do, which is the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5037 - 2017-09-19