Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 58965 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 58965 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Melvin Beasley
? Beasley claims that he is entitled to a modification of his sentence because the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8471 - 2017-09-19
? Beasley claims that he is entitled to a modification of his sentence because the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8471 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
to render him incapable of safely driving. It is claimed that the amount of alcohol consumed by Mr. Amerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
to render him incapable of safely driving. It is claimed that the amount of alcohol consumed by Mr. Amerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of habeas corpus, based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93708 - 2014-09-15
of habeas corpus, based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Larry J. Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
because he was not impartial. The adjustment committee concluded in response to this claim raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12638 - 2017-09-21
because he was not impartial. The adjustment committee concluded in response to this claim raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12638 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
that Barbian had claimed to be cocaine was not cocaine. The police then decided to find Barbian to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
that Barbian had claimed to be cocaine was not cocaine. The police then decided to find Barbian to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
Ronald C. Steffens v. Del Sievert Trucking, Inc.
. and Nelda J. Steffens appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims against Del Sievert Trucking, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10044 - 2017-09-19
. and Nelda J. Steffens appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims against Del Sievert Trucking, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10044 - 2017-09-19
State v. John E. Triplett
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kurt Gilkes
Schleiss v. State, 71 Wis.2d 733, 739, 239 N.W.2d 68, 73 (1976). We also reject Gilkes’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11646 - 2017-09-19
Schleiss v. State, 71 Wis.2d 733, 739, 239 N.W.2d 68, 73 (1976). We also reject Gilkes’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11646 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Taylor Vincent Powers v. Terry Dachel
injury. The Dachels moved for summary judgment, claiming that they were immune from suit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13588 - 2017-09-21
injury. The Dachels moved for summary judgment, claiming that they were immune from suit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13588 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Langreck v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
the foreclosure action. WILMIC claims that Langreck should have argued that the Bank was not entitled to full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14267 - 2014-09-15
the foreclosure action. WILMIC claims that Langreck should have argued that the Bank was not entitled to full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14267 - 2014-09-15