Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 68502 for did.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[a] review of the sentencing transcript demonstrates that [the trial court] did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
that “[a] review of the sentencing transcript demonstrates that [the trial court] did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
at this time.” George filed a motion to have the DHA found in contempt and for sanctions because the DOC did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2014-02-18
at this time.” George filed a motion to have the DHA found in contempt and for sanctions because the DOC did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2014-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
explained and did not prejudice Rich. Finding no statute or rule violation, the DOA denied her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
explained and did not prejudice Rich. Finding no statute or rule violation, the DOA denied her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
in Sauk County and began the pursuit in Sauk County but Sugden did not stop until he was about a quarter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88622 - 2012-10-24
in Sauk County and began the pursuit in Sauk County but Sugden did not stop until he was about a quarter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88622 - 2012-10-24
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in 1 Agent Kellen did not supervise Cook, but testified at trial that she reviewed Department files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
in 1 Agent Kellen did not supervise Cook, but testified at trial that she reviewed Department files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
, during the testimony of certain witnesses. Defense counsel did not object to this decision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
, during the testimony of certain witnesses. Defense counsel did not object to this decision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and complete those before July 2009. ¶11 Porcaro did not make the improvements to the property as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87751 - 2014-09-15
and complete those before July 2009. ¶11 Porcaro did not make the improvements to the property as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
did not break down the remaining 14% of the jobs into categories of jobs which Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12204 - 2017-09-21
did not break down the remaining 14% of the jobs into categories of jobs which Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12204 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the basement and was subdued and arrested. ¶7 Redmond did not object to any of Thiel’s testimony, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75748 - 2011-12-27
to the basement and was subdued and arrested. ¶7 Redmond did not object to any of Thiel’s testimony, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75748 - 2011-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the downspout at issue was an improvement and that Tippecanoe did not install, alter, or modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699541 - 2023-09-06
that the downspout at issue was an improvement and that Tippecanoe did not install, alter, or modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699541 - 2023-09-06