Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 68502 for did.
Search results 41661 - 41670 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
-Hernandez did not go to the station voluntarily. According to Gutierrez-Hernandez, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81566 - 2012-04-25
-Hernandez did not go to the station voluntarily. According to Gutierrez-Hernandez, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81566 - 2012-04-25
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
, the trial court did not order an eventual transition to equal placement. Instead, the trial court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court did not order an eventual transition to equal placement. Instead, the trial court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
either show that the plea colloquy was defective and the defendant did not understand information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
either show that the plea colloquy was defective and the defendant did not understand information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Woodstock, Illinois office. Martin did not dispute any of these averments, but contended that Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
of the Woodstock, Illinois office. Martin did not dispute any of these averments, but contended that Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gilles H. Glassiognon
. Glassiognon did not appear at a pretrial conference on September 7, but was represented by an assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
. Glassiognon did not appear at a pretrial conference on September 7, but was represented by an assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not understand information that should have been provided, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-15
did not understand information that should have been provided, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[a] review of the sentencing transcript demonstrates that [the trial court] did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
that “[a] review of the sentencing transcript demonstrates that [the trial court] did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30