Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41681 - 41690 of 69114 for he.
Search results 41681 - 41690 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, for Fourth Amendment purposes, the officer seized Blaha when he told her to remain where she was, just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28645 - 2014-09-15
that, for Fourth Amendment purposes, the officer seized Blaha when he told her to remain where she was, just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28645 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the Commission’s findings, we affirm. ¶2 Ramos was injured when he fell approximately 25-30 feet from a roof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42500 - 2014-09-15
the Commission’s findings, we affirm. ¶2 Ramos was injured when he fell approximately 25-30 feet from a roof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
attacked and beat a complete stranger as he was leaving a bar, without provocation. The victim suffered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
attacked and beat a complete stranger as he was leaving a bar, without provocation. The victim suffered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114087 - 2014-06-09
claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114087 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06. He raised five claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
relief, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06. He raised five claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concludes that, even if trial counsel’s performance was deficient, Hill cannot allege prejudice because he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559441 - 2022-08-30
concludes that, even if trial counsel’s performance was deficient, Hill cannot allege prejudice because he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559441 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by “Hauser.”2 ¶3 Joe answered that neither he nor his father had entered into a contract with Didion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
by “Hauser.”2 ¶3 Joe answered that neither he nor his father had entered into a contract with Didion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. We conclude that Newson’s motion is more accurately one for resentencing because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47252 - 2010-02-22
for sentence modification. We conclude that Newson’s motion is more accurately one for resentencing because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47252 - 2010-02-22
State v. Robert W. Miller
demonstrated that he would likely not comply with the rules accompanying the granting of Huber law privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
demonstrated that he would likely not comply with the rules accompanying the granting of Huber law privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for reconsideration, and he does not raise any “new factor” argument. Rather, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22
motion for reconsideration, and he does not raise any “new factor” argument. Rather, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22