Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41691 - 41700 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 41691 - 41700 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
on a stipulated record, the ALJ ruled that Acuity knew or should have known there was no reasonable basis to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143554 - 2015-06-29
on a stipulated record, the ALJ ruled that Acuity knew or should have known there was no reasonable basis to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143554 - 2015-06-29
State v. Susan J. Seim
records” policy, the district attorney provided Seim with the names of all the witnesses to be used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
records” policy, the district attorney provided Seim with the names of all the witnesses to be used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
Bernhard K. Benn v. Larry L. Vitort
that the Benns failed to present sufficient proofs to entitle them to judgment and that the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5637 - 2005-03-31
that the Benns failed to present sufficient proofs to entitle them to judgment and that the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5637 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
)(a) provided credit against civil commitments, the record does not support that Lounsbury was in custody under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
)(a) provided credit against civil commitments, the record does not support that Lounsbury was in custody under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
not file a response. We concluded that the Record disclosed no arguably meritorious issues, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2012-01-11
not file a response. We concluded that the Record disclosed no arguably meritorious issues, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2012-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
entered into the stipulation, Bradley stated on the record before a court commissioner that she would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08
entered into the stipulation, Bradley stated on the record before a court commissioner that she would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08
State v. Paul Sappington
163 (1991). We will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary act if the record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
163 (1991). We will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary act if the record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
concedes the record does not support the prosecutor’s assertion that Daniels was “leaning on the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2014-11-05
concedes the record does not support the prosecutor’s assertion that Daniels was “leaning on the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2014-11-05
State v. Scott A. Abbott
is not at issue. The record clearly establishes that Abbott was contained within RCCI from the date of transfer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11122 - 2005-03-31
is not at issue. The record clearly establishes that Abbott was contained within RCCI from the date of transfer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11122 - 2005-03-31