Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 19107 for citi.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 19107 for citi.
State v. James N. Storlie
to defendant’s conviction. ¶10 In a similar vein, in Ortiz, we concluded that the City of Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4704 - 2005-03-31
to defendant’s conviction. ¶10 In a similar vein, in Ortiz, we concluded that the City of Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4704 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“sitting … on the front stoop” of a house located on North 12th Street in the city of Milwaukee. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
“sitting … on the front stoop” of a house located on North 12th Street in the city of Milwaukee. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
Donna Walag v. Town of Randall
621, 627 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Certain Electors of Racine v. City of Racine, 1 Wis.2d 35, 37, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31
621, 627 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Certain Electors of Racine v. City of Racine, 1 Wis.2d 35, 37, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey S. Tennant
of a weapon. On May 29, 1997, city of Kenosha police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13985 - 2005-03-31
of a weapon. On May 29, 1997, city of Kenosha police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13985 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn E. Avery
the judgment and remand for further proceedings. FACTS ¶3 Officer James Olson of the City of Sheboygan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and remand for further proceedings. FACTS ¶3 Officer James Olson of the City of Sheboygan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not entitled to be heard on a second or subsequent motion for reconsideration.” See, e.g., City of Edgerton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834371 - 2024-08-07
is not entitled to be heard on a second or subsequent motion for reconsideration.” See, e.g., City of Edgerton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834371 - 2024-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CITY OF SUN PRAIRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CITY OF SUN PRAIRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Tennant
of a weapon. On May 29, 1997, city of Kenosha police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13985 - 2014-09-15
of a weapon. On May 29, 1997, city of Kenosha police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13985 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Earl Meredith
DISTRICT I CITY OF MILWAUKEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. EARL MEREDITH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21
DISTRICT I CITY OF MILWAUKEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. EARL MEREDITH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21