Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 19106 for citi.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 19106 for citi.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not entitled to be heard on a second or subsequent motion for reconsideration.” See, e.g., City of Edgerton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834371 - 2024-08-07
is not entitled to be heard on a second or subsequent motion for reconsideration.” See, e.g., City of Edgerton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834371 - 2024-08-07
[PDF]
State v. James N. Storlie
, in Ortiz, we concluded that the City of Racine was not a victim entitled to restitution under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4704 - 2017-09-19
, in Ortiz, we concluded that the City of Racine was not a victim entitled to restitution under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4704 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Todd J. Gerrits
. Specifically, Konkle believed Gerrits was in violation of a city ordinance prohibiting extremely loud noise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15311 - 2017-09-21
. Specifically, Konkle believed Gerrits was in violation of a city ordinance prohibiting extremely loud noise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15311 - 2017-09-21
Village of Waunakee v. Donald Maier
. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 184 Wis.2d 155, 164, 516 N.W.2d 376, 378 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11463 - 2005-03-31
. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 184 Wis.2d 155, 164, 516 N.W.2d 376, 378 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” City of Wauwatosa v. LIRC, 110 Wis. 2d 298, 301, 328 N.W.2d 882 (Ct. App. 1982). Here, Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21
.” City of Wauwatosa v. LIRC, 110 Wis. 2d 298, 301, 328 N.W.2d 882 (Ct. App. 1982). Here, Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The City of Milwaukee was the employer in that case. Appeal No. 2009AP932 is from Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50274 - 2014-09-15
. The City of Milwaukee was the employer in that case. Appeal No. 2009AP932 is from Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CITY OF SUN PRAIRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CITY OF SUN PRAIRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
. 03TR005591 03TR005592 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II CITY OF SHEBOYGAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7309 - 2017-09-20
. 03TR005591 03TR005592 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II CITY OF SHEBOYGAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7309 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Green Bay Prof’l Police Ass’n v. City of Green Bay 1 10-15-2013 Reversed 2013AP000300 Bret N
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105483 - 2017-09-21
Green Bay Prof’l Police Ass’n v. City of Green Bay 1 10-15-2013 Reversed 2013AP000300 Bret N
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105483 - 2017-09-21
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
DISTRICT II City of Sheboygan, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2007-01-18
DISTRICT II City of Sheboygan, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2007-01-18