Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 29810 for des.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 29810 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolelfree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143896 - 2015-07-06
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolelfree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143896 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Richard J. Callaway v. Teamsters Union Local 695
with Madison Metro. The construction of a contract is a question of law which we review de novo. Tempelis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8377 - 2017-09-19
with Madison Metro. The construction of a contract is a question of law which we review de novo. Tempelis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8377 - 2017-09-19
State v. David D. Brown
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals from the extension of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26342 - 2017-09-21
DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals from the extension of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Plevak
an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15494 - 2017-09-21
an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15494 - 2017-09-21
Ronald DeLong v. Kenneth Hess
have influenced the circuit court’s decision. However, because we review summary judgments de novo, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4541 - 2005-03-31
have influenced the circuit court’s decision. However, because we review summary judgments de novo, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gordon Wipperfurth v. Marvin Krzykowski
review is de novo. The Wipperfurths do not dispute that the permit would be denied under both the 1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11279 - 2017-09-19
review is de novo. The Wipperfurths do not dispute that the permit would be denied under both the 1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11279 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on the telephone. Grunwald, however, had a de novo appeal to the circuit court of the court commissioner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30056 - 2007-08-22
on the telephone. Grunwald, however, had a de novo appeal to the circuit court of the court commissioner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30056 - 2007-08-22
State v. Charles A. Toal
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
principles to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
County of Calumet v. Michael Schroeder
of law and fact. Interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13937 - 2005-03-31
of law and fact. Interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13937 - 2005-03-31