Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 81766 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 81766 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an alley, a common place for drug sales, in the early morning hours, in order to dispel or confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154618 - 2017-09-21
of an alley, a common place for drug sales, in the early morning hours, in order to dispel or confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154618 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the results of her blood alcohol test should be suppressed because the person who drew her blood did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36349 - 2009-05-05
that the results of her blood alcohol test should be suppressed because the person who drew her blood did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36349 - 2009-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
for an investigative stop. ¶2 Hansen also argues that the results of her blood alcohol test should be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36349 - 2014-09-15
for an investigative stop. ¶2 Hansen also argues that the results of her blood alcohol test should be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36349 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Biese v. Parker Coatings, Inc.
951, 960 (8 th Cir. 1974), we applied the predominant purpose test to determine whether a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14057 - 2014-09-15
951, 960 (8 th Cir. 1974), we applied the predominant purpose test to determine whether a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14057 - 2014-09-15
Daniel Biese v. Parker Coatings, Inc.
. 1974), we applied the predominant purpose test to determine whether a mixed contract, one for both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14057 - 2005-03-31
. 1974), we applied the predominant purpose test to determine whether a mixed contract, one for both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14057 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to provide a sample of his or her breath for a preliminary breath screening test using a device approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41938 - 2009-10-07
to provide a sample of his or her breath for a preliminary breath screening test using a device approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41938 - 2009-10-07
State v. Singkeo Inphachack
with intent to deliver. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
with intent to deliver. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark H. Brooks
. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J. Mark H. Brooks appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J. Mark H. Brooks appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
independently.” Id. at 128. “[C]ourts may reverse the order of the two tests or avoid the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192735 - 2017-09-21
independently.” Id. at 128. “[C]ourts may reverse the order of the two tests or avoid the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192735 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert John Kotz
as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. The order granting a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. The order granting a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31