Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 64825 for records.
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
State v. Isiah Washington
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
consecutively to a current sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
consecutively to a current sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP577-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113217 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP577-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847013 - 2024-09-11
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847013 - 2024-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
2 record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170540 - 2017-09-21
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629101 - 2023-03-08
confinement. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629101 - 2023-03-08