Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 7626 for yes.
Search results 4171 - 4180 of 7626 for yes.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: [Waters’ counsel]: Yes, Judge. My argument would be that [Deputy Welsch] had information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240150 - 2019-05-09
: [Waters’ counsel]: Yes, Judge. My argument would be that [Deputy Welsch] had information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240150 - 2019-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that Watson “said ‘yes,’ and opened the door more fully so [the officers] could come in.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89201 - 2012-11-13
testified that Watson “said ‘yes,’ and opened the door more fully so [the officers] could come in.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89201 - 2012-11-13
State v. Mark D. Pett
the State to ask only if Pett had been convicted of crimes and, if Pett answered “yes” on the stand, how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
the State to ask only if Pett had been convicted of crimes and, if Pett answered “yes” on the stand, how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dustin W. B.
said yes. Q. What happened then? A. I pulled out a butane lighter and a cigarette wrapper with green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5191 - 2005-03-31
said yes. Q. What happened then? A. I pulled out a butane lighter and a cigarette wrapper with green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will?”; Gilmour responded, “Yes.” Gilmour expressly agreed to the facts as set forth in the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83842 - 2014-09-15
will?”; Gilmour responded, “Yes.” Gilmour expressly agreed to the facts as set forth in the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ripple Management v. Diana Goodavage
with this addition, and Goodavage answered “yes.” The court then signed an order approving the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4474 - 2017-09-19
with this addition, and Goodavage answered “yes.” The court then signed an order approving the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4474 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
bodily harm. Do you understand that? [McElroy]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
bodily harm. Do you understand that? [McElroy]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
State v. Jackie C.
position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has no desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5341 - 2011-02-06
position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has no desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5341 - 2011-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
if that friend was “Pingo,” i.e.[,] Pringle, and Farr said yes. Plainly then, Gomez already knew that Farr’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
if that friend was “Pingo,” i.e.[,] Pringle, and Farr said yes. Plainly then, Gomez already knew that Farr’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
State v. Michael W. Farrell
; is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I have, your Honor. THE COURT: Are there any problems that would exist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
; is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I have, your Honor. THE COURT: Are there any problems that would exist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31