Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41701 - 41710 of 75032 for judgment for us.
Search results 41701 - 41710 of 75032 for judgment for us.
State v. Charles C. Downing
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17111 - 2005-03-31
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles C. Downing
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17111 - 2017-09-21
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17111 - 2017-09-21
State v. John C. Setagord
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lance R. Ward
(State) seeks review of a court of appeals’ decision that reversed a judgment of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17286 - 2017-09-21
(State) seeks review of a court of appeals’ decision that reversed a judgment of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. MORGAN-OWENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34899 - 2014-09-15
. MORGAN-OWENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34899 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of a “summary of evidence and his conclusions thereon” may not be used on summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
of a “summary of evidence and his conclusions thereon” may not be used on summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: SARAH M HARLESS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925285 - 2025-03-11
from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: SARAH M HARLESS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925285 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of Supreme Court Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
of Supreme Court Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of Supreme Court Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
of Supreme Court Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
of Supreme Court Madison, WI APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Racine County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
of Supreme Court Madison, WI APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Racine County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21