Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41701 - 41710 of 64150 for records.

[PDF]
recording and transcript of Hampton’s interrogation set forth the following facts relevant to Hampton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841113 - 2024-08-22

State v. Jene R. Bodoh
on review of the record may have been rejected as unreasonable by the trier of fact in view of the evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17214 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
girlfriend on a recorded jail telephone call that he needed to “‘do the right thing to get me up,’” which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122803 - 2014-09-29

Joseph Balistrieri v. Jennie Alioto
Balistrieri and recorded the conversation. A transcript of the exchange was admitted into evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20458 - 2005-11-30

Ronald W. Coutts, Sr. v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
benefit payable," and there is no evidence in the record that the Board has ever considered whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17034 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
no identifications. A copy of the lab report recording the crime lab’s conclusions was admitted into evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65045 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
21; the separately recorded easement; an aerial view of Lot 1; and a survey map of the Cactus Acres
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869656 - 2024-11-01

[PDF] John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
the trial court’s orders. In fact, the record reveals that the chairman of the FPC declared, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in that case. More specifically, the State does not provide any record support for its assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845371 - 2024-09-06

State v. Ricky D. Loret
sincerity and our review of this record provides no support for a contrary conclusion. Therefore, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14995 - 2005-03-31