Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41721 - 41730 of 65903 for e j.
Search results 41721 - 41730 of 65903 for e j.
COURT OF APPEALS
of anger: [H]e and another member of his family, as Tena Carpenter described it, was threatened on the dee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2013-04-10
of anger: [H]e and another member of his family, as Tena Carpenter described it, was threatened on the dee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2013-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690-91. Specifically, “[w]e will in fact second-guess a lawyer if the initial guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28209 - 2007-02-26
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690-91. Specifically, “[w]e will in fact second-guess a lawyer if the initial guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28209 - 2007-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102469 - 2013-09-30
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102469 - 2013-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
]e can do no better than speculate on what would have been the result if [Oliver]’s counsel had used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49337 - 2010-04-26
]e can do no better than speculate on what would have been the result if [Oliver]’s counsel had used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49337 - 2010-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
to “tak[e] into consideration the defendant’s account, knowing that two shots were fired.” ¶24 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
to “tak[e] into consideration the defendant’s account, knowing that two shots were fired.” ¶24 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
State v. Anthony James Daniels
a new trial. E. Sentencing Discretion Daniels further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
a new trial. E. Sentencing Discretion Daniels further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to “disprov[e] he had prior knowledge that the weapon would fall into the hands of a convicted felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2013-02-09
to “disprov[e] he had prior knowledge that the weapon would fall into the hands of a convicted felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2013-02-09
2008 WI APP 14
, and as authorized under 45 CFR 164, subpart E. ¶7 Statutory interpretation begins with the statute’s text; we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31235 - 2008-01-29
, and as authorized under 45 CFR 164, subpart E. ¶7 Statutory interpretation begins with the statute’s text; we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31235 - 2008-01-29
State v. William A.H.
criminal history was relevant because “we are dealing in the real world…. [E]vidence as to his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12892 - 2005-03-31
criminal history was relevant because “we are dealing in the real world…. [E]vidence as to his criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12892 - 2005-03-31