Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41741 - 41750 of 68730 for did.
Search results 41741 - 41750 of 68730 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State did not fully disclose the terms of the agreement it struck with Waters and Jefferson and relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41241 - 2009-09-22
that the State did not fully disclose the terms of the agreement it struck with Waters and Jefferson and relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41241 - 2009-09-22
Mary B. Anderson v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
of its expert witnesses that, again as phrased by its main brief on this appeal, Mr. Anderson “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4054 - 2005-03-31
of its expert witnesses that, again as phrased by its main brief on this appeal, Mr. Anderson “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4054 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to end. The portion of the form provided by M.S. did not include the bottom of the form, which contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
to end. The portion of the form provided by M.S. did not include the bottom of the form, which contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of cocaine. The State qualified its estimate, however, by noting that the amount did not include
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380863 - 2021-06-29
of cocaine. The State qualified its estimate, however, by noting that the amount did not include
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380863 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
State v. William A. Spring
determined that the use and content of the form did not violate the implied consent law. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
determined that the use and content of the form did not violate the implied consent law. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lilie-Jean Awsumb v. David A. Thompson
’ property.2 David did not notify the Awsumbs about the pending sale or provide them with the opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7312 - 2017-09-20
’ property.2 David did not notify the Awsumbs about the pending sale or provide them with the opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7312 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Talia’s counsel confirmed that there was outstanding discovery and did not object to adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
. Talia’s counsel confirmed that there was outstanding discovery and did not object to adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7577 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7577 - 2005-03-31
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13174 - 2005-03-31
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13174 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 943.201(2)(c) (2005-06).[1] Peck argues on appeal, as he did on motions after verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34642 - 2008-11-18
. Stat. § 943.201(2)(c) (2005-06).[1] Peck argues on appeal, as he did on motions after verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34642 - 2008-11-18