Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41741 - 41750 of 57346 for id.

Cheryl Jean Swetlik v. William Philip Swetlik
the child would have enjoyed had the marriage continued. Id. at ¶36. Thus, it accommodates the parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3608 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. Marcella G.
lacked standing to do so. See id. ¶8 Our conclusion is consistent with both the plain language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3818 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the defense. Id., ¶26 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)). An attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16

[PDF] Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
.” Id. ¶9 At the revocation hearing, the State has the burden of proving the alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18649 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Edward N. Gerczak, Jr. v. Edward N. Gerczak, Sr.
different application of Wisconsin’s deadman’s statute. See id. The passages cited by Edward, Jr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18548 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and was not unconstitutionally vague. Id., 28 Wis. 2d at 115. Givens explained that the legislature used the phrase “otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01

State v. Cornelius Reed
will reach a different result. Id. In this case, the trial court concluded, and the State does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9497 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert A. Smith v. Janet H. Sahagian
from the rule.” Id. ¶14 We conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15587 - 2017-09-21

Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
, we begin with the plain meaning of the language chosen. Id. “If the language employed is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3747 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
been needed for the original stop, must be supported by reasonable suspicion.” Id., ¶¶34-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13