Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41771 - 41780 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 41771 - 41780 of 84318 for case number.
State v. One 1997 Ford F-150
2003 WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2685 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2685 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
State v. Monika S. Lackershire
2005 WI App 265 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1189-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
2005 WI App 265 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1189-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Nakia N. Hayes
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason W. Wright
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8269 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8269 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Slinker
with Slinker’s then-existing sentence in the Sheboygan County case. ¶3 In 1998 the trial court vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6679 - 2005-03-31
with Slinker’s then-existing sentence in the Sheboygan County case. ¶3 In 1998 the trial court vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because Milewski made a “legitimate, reasonable request for an alternative test, which in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
because Milewski made a “legitimate, reasonable request for an alternative test, which in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
or not. You might be wondering why are we here? If the case is that obvious, if the case is that strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59410 - 2014-09-15
or not. You might be wondering why are we here? If the case is that obvious, if the case is that strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 343.303, and our supreme court previously determined in a case involving similar facts that excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248345 - 2019-10-08
. § 343.303, and our supreme court previously determined in a case involving similar facts that excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248345 - 2019-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Khounmy Lanoi
. The responding officers testified during the State’s case-in-chief that Lanoi declined to speak to them upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12278 - 2017-09-21
. The responding officers testified during the State’s case-in-chief that Lanoi declined to speak to them upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12278 - 2017-09-21
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
in the CHIPS case. He argued that the testimony of these witnesses revealed confidential communications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20284 - 2005-11-16
in the CHIPS case. He argued that the testimony of these witnesses revealed confidential communications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20284 - 2005-11-16