Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41781 - 41790 of 46292 for adult name change.

State v. Robert P. Hinchey
classification was subsequently changed. [4] Veach’s claims arose in the context of an ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5930 - 2005-03-31

2006 WI APP 228
: Internalizing Changes in the Right to Confrontation After Crawford v. Washington Both Nationally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20

Adela S. Hagen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
symptoms. However, after Dr. Kruse performed surgery on Hagen's shoulder, Dr. Varia changed her opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16899 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
to testify, but, after a break, informed the court that he had changed his mind. The court then conducted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93382 - 2013-02-24

State v. Kevin E. Daugherty
then changed from a citizen in possible distress to an individual reasonably suspected of OWI, justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25256 - 2006-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
acquiescence, or change of defendant’s position, has been held sufficient.” Flejter, 240 Wis. 2d 401, ¶41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29936 - 2007-08-08

Robert Donald Lewerenz v. Jane Carol Lewerenz
of the parties; the absence of evidence relating to any changes in the educational level of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12749 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
for psychological examinations during the trial amount to a change of trial strategy. A deliberate choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
that differently than one where you have some immediate action that is going to result in some dramatic change
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20018 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald Wolf v. Patricia Sekeres
reason for changing the existing rule is the difficulty in drawing the dividing line between assumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11478 - 2017-09-19