Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41781 - 41790 of 68202 for law.
Search results 41781 - 41790 of 68202 for law.
Terrance McKillop v. County of Kenosha
that the Board did not act according to the law in denying the permit because the repair or alteration was less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10199 - 2005-03-31
that the Board did not act according to the law in denying the permit because the repair or alteration was less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10199 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
an additional breath test, which was improperly denied under the Implied Consent law. The court further held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31
an additional breath test, which was improperly denied under the Implied Consent law. The court further held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Bay, WI 54305-3600 Timothy T. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office P.O. Box 1625 Green Bay, WI 54305-1625
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
Bay, WI 54305-3600 Timothy T. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office P.O. Box 1625 Green Bay, WI 54305-1625
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction; (2) it acted according to law; (3) its action was not arbitrary; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35114 - 2009-01-07
jurisdiction; (2) it acted according to law; (3) its action was not arbitrary; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35114 - 2009-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was valid based on the facts found by the trial court is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
was valid based on the facts found by the trial court is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
State v. Susan C. Lulling
to undisputed facts is a matter of law which we decide without deference to the trial court's opinion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11115 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts is a matter of law which we decide without deference to the trial court's opinion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11115 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
, 105 (1988). A trial court erroneously exercises its discretion if it misapplies the law or relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
, 105 (1988). A trial court erroneously exercises its discretion if it misapplies the law or relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 517 U.S. 806, 809-10 (1996)). “[R]easonable suspicion that a traffic law has been or is being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173192 - 2017-09-21
, 517 U.S. 806, 809-10 (1996)). “[R]easonable suspicion that a traffic law has been or is being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173192 - 2017-09-21
David Burch v. Village of Hammond
) the board acted according to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
) the board acted according to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31