Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 70028 for as he.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 70028 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
armed robbery—all as a repeater. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641855 - 2023-04-12
armed robbery—all as a repeater. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641855 - 2023-04-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and before he consented to a blood 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683141 - 2023-07-27
and before he consented to a blood 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683141 - 2023-07-27
State v. Ernest E. Burton
motion. Burton argues that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Burton also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31
motion. Burton argues that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Burton also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
for theft, trespass and criminal damage to property. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
for theft, trespass and criminal damage to property. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon approaching, he saw Dettlaff put the vehicle in park. When Dettlaff exited the truck through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206853 - 2018-01-17
. Upon approaching, he saw Dettlaff put the vehicle in park. When Dettlaff exited the truck through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206853 - 2018-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial because his attorney (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33423 - 2008-07-16
argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial because his attorney (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33423 - 2008-07-16
Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
of the decision as required by Wis. Stat. § 893.735 (1997-98).[1] Shimkus contends in his appellate brief, as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2431 - 2005-03-31
of the decision as required by Wis. Stat. § 893.735 (1997-98).[1] Shimkus contends in his appellate brief, as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), eighth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2021-22).1 He contends the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705148 - 2023-09-20
), eighth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2021-22).1 He contends the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705148 - 2023-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), eighth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2021-22).1 He contends the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705148 - 2023-09-20
), eighth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2021-22).1 He contends the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705148 - 2023-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the trial of his co-actor. Jeter argues that he is entitled to resentencing because of that alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248827 - 2019-10-22
at the trial of his co-actor. Jeter argues that he is entitled to resentencing because of that alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248827 - 2019-10-22