Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 97578 for court system search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 97578 for court system search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the probable cause extended to permit a search of Anderson’s person. Our supreme court has explained that “[w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138608 - 2015-03-30
of the probable cause extended to permit a search of Anderson’s person. Our supreme court has explained that “[w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138608 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 3, 2024 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821267 - 2024-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 3, 2024 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821267 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
occupant about a potential search warrant. As the circuit court summed it up, “Officer Beach knocked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683663 - 2023-07-27
occupant about a potential search warrant. As the circuit court summed it up, “Officer Beach knocked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683663 - 2023-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2011AP1770-CR 2011AP1771-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84918 - 2012-08-28
court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2011AP1770-CR 2011AP1771-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84918 - 2012-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to justify the protective searches. We disagree, and affirm the circuit court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
suspicion to justify the protective searches. We disagree, and affirm the circuit court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 30, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 30, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
containing two baggies of unsmoked marijuana. Id. This court deemed it “significant” that Mata was searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2010-05-23
containing two baggies of unsmoked marijuana. Id. This court deemed it “significant” that Mata was searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2010-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, and therefore properly conducted the pat-down search for weapons to protect themselves. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17
, and therefore properly conducted the pat-down search for weapons to protect themselves. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to search Brooks’ residences. To the extent the court should have granted the motion to exclude the kitchen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48812 - 2010-04-07
to search Brooks’ residences. To the extent the court should have granted the motion to exclude the kitchen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48812 - 2010-04-07