Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 8261 for gf-175.

COURT OF APPEALS
and rule on it. State v. Ledger, 175 Wis. 2d 116, 135, 499 N.W.2d 198 (Ct. App. 1993). We reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55084 - 2010-10-05

[PDF] State v.
and approximately 175-180 pounds.2 Finally, both Buzaitis and Green Bay Police Lieutenant Thomas Molitor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., Inc., 195 Wis. 2d 485, 497, 536 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1995). We will reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6399 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Scott W. Nagel
v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175 (1982). ¶6 Here, the court admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4982 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Lonny Mayer
. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681-82, 499 N.W.2d 631 (1993). ¶22 Mayer does not argue the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Robert E. Willow v. City of Menomonie
N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1995), and owing no deference to the trial court’s determination. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5852 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Martin J. Applebee
of record. State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262 (Ct. App. 1992). ¶18 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3349 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The Estate of Richmond P. Izard v. Richmond P. Izard
by clear and convincing evidence.” Lundin v. Shimanski, 124 Wis. 2d 175, 184, 368 N.W.2d 676 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5905 - 2017-09-19

Linda M. Heath-Miller v. Mark A. Miller
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
advantage in considering the relevant factors and the demeanor of the defendant.” State v. Echols, 175
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251048 - 2019-12-04