Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 84652 for https:/fifthdistrictcourt.nmcourts.gov/lea-jury-reporting-times.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 84652 for https:/fifthdistrictcourt.nmcourts.gov/lea-jury-reporting-times.
State v. David W. Stokes
at the time of the first trial." On appeal, Stokes seeks a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
at the time of the first trial." On appeal, Stokes seeks a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Stokes
at the time of the first trial." On appeal, Stokes seeks a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
at the time of the first trial." On appeal, Stokes seeks a new trial because the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric W. Raye
After further deliberations, the jury returned the same verdict, this time without dissent. Raye
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18434 - 2017-09-21
After further deliberations, the jury returned the same verdict, this time without dissent. Raye
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18434 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric W. Raye
After further deliberations, the jury returned the same verdict, this time without dissent. Raye
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06
After further deliberations, the jury returned the same verdict, this time without dissent. Raye
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Miller called 911 to report it. Id., ¶14. No. 2017AP2199-CR 15 ¶30 A jury found Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227192 - 2018-11-15
, Miller called 911 to report it. Id., ¶14. No. 2017AP2199-CR 15 ¶30 A jury found Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227192 - 2018-11-15
Rosetta A. Jorenby v. John Heibl
on June 19, 1995." The court considered that it was "beyond question" that the jury demand was timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9821 - 2005-03-31
on June 19, 1995." The court considered that it was "beyond question" that the jury demand was timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosetta A. Jorenby v. John Heibl
that it No. 95-2841 -4- was "beyond question" that the jury demand was timely. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9821 - 2017-09-19
that it No. 95-2841 -4- was "beyond question" that the jury demand was timely. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9821 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bruce Sanders
, and said: “At this time I am going to send the jury back in to continue their deliberations to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15850 - 2005-03-31
, and said: “At this time I am going to send the jury back in to continue their deliberations to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Sanders
, and said: “At this time I am going to send the jury back in to continue their deliberations to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15850 - 2017-09-21
, and said: “At this time I am going to send the jury back in to continue their deliberations to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
time of her earlier patrol, the jury could have inferred from her testimony that she had recently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763927 - 2024-02-15
time of her earlier patrol, the jury could have inferred from her testimony that she had recently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763927 - 2024-02-15