Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 67883 for law.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 67883 for law.
State v. Jeffrey G. Henschel
on the grounds that his double jeopardy rights had been violated. He alleged that law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that his double jeopardy rights had been violated. He alleged that law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott E. Brandstetter
are multiplicitous: (1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact, and (2) if they are identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6293 - 2005-03-31
are multiplicitous: (1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact, and (2) if they are identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6293 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Aiken & Scoptur v. John Brendel
, V. JOHN BRENDEL AND BRENDEL LAW OFFICES, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4314 - 2017-09-19
, V. JOHN BRENDEL AND BRENDEL LAW OFFICES, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4314 - 2017-09-19
Steve Kuski v. Jeremiah George
question of law and fact is presented. Id. We uphold a trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3166 - 2005-03-31
question of law and fact is presented. Id. We uphold a trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel R. French
, is a question of law that this court reviews independently. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6614 - 2017-09-19
, is a question of law that this court reviews independently. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6614 - 2017-09-19
State v. James G. Halverson
that Halverson had violated the law and that the scope of the seizure was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5070 - 2005-03-31
that Halverson had violated the law and that the scope of the seizure was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cooperation with law enforcement. The State directed the circuit court to the presentence investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240641 - 2019-05-15
cooperation with law enforcement. The State directed the circuit court to the presentence investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240641 - 2019-05-15
[PDF]
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
as determined fulfill a legal conclusion presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Popp v. Popp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
as determined fulfill a legal conclusion presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Popp v. Popp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
were factual rather than analyzing statutory and case law to resolve its motion, and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
were factual rather than analyzing statutory and case law to resolve its motion, and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James G. Halverson
conclude that the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion that Halverson had violated the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5070 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion that Halverson had violated the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5070 - 2017-09-19