Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41811 - 41820 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 41811 - 41820 of 83395 for simple case search.
Richard Winters v. Gary R. McCaughtry
or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise of discretion is outside the range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7471 - 2005-03-31
or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise of discretion is outside the range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7471 - 2005-03-31
State v. George Taylor
analyzed the case as one presenting an ineffective assistance of counsel issue and refused to apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
analyzed the case as one presenting an ineffective assistance of counsel issue and refused to apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the case. For the following reasons, we disagree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Billy Ray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02
to dismiss the case. For the following reasons, we disagree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Billy Ray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
] Neung was unable to post bail and therefore remained incarcerated during the pendency of her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2205 - 2005-03-31
] Neung was unable to post bail and therefore remained incarcerated during the pendency of her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy G. Squires
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3302-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11714 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3302-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11714 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
arbitrator; and American Family’s petition to the circuit court in this case was void because it violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100892 - 2013-08-14
arbitrator; and American Family’s petition to the circuit court in this case was void because it violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100892 - 2013-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2009 WI App 126 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP2604 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38091 - 2011-02-07
2009 WI App 126 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP2604 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38091 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sexual history with the victim in this case and the court’s admission of other-acts evidence relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763337 - 2024-02-13
sexual history with the victim in this case and the court’s admission of other-acts evidence relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763337 - 2024-02-13
State v. Randall W. Edwards
, retain, perceive and relate information differently than adults …. [A]nd this case involves a delayed
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
, retain, perceive and relate information differently than adults …. [A]nd this case involves a delayed
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child under the age of thirteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1).[2] The victim in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67971 - 2011-07-13
of a child under the age of thirteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1).[2] The victim in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67971 - 2011-07-13