Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41821 - 41830 of 68544 for did.
Search results 41821 - 41830 of 68544 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a temporary order issued by the family court which it did not have jurisdiction to enforce. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15
of a temporary order issued by the family court which it did not have jurisdiction to enforce. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15
Susan Stauss v. Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Inc.
that Stauss claimed to be having regular sexual contacts with DeVries. At first HIL did not believe Stauss’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16016 - 2005-03-31
that Stauss claimed to be having regular sexual contacts with DeVries. At first HIL did not believe Stauss’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16016 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nakia N. Hayes
Boldus's affidavit did not expressly so state. That same day, Boldus executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8280 - 2005-03-31
Boldus's affidavit did not expressly so state. That same day, Boldus executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8280 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to prove that: (1) Davis had sexual intercourse with B.A.B.; (2) B.A.B. did not consent to the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251051 - 2019-12-10
to prove that: (1) Davis had sexual intercourse with B.A.B.; (2) B.A.B. did not consent to the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251051 - 2019-12-10
[PDF]
Milos Lazarevic v. Suzette L. Turner-Williams
or ten feet away from him, and that she stopped her car. She further testified that Lazarevic did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17889 - 2017-09-21
or ten feet away from him, and that she stopped her car. She further testified that Lazarevic did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not preclude state law actions for damages or injunctive relief arising from violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91216 - 2014-09-15
did not preclude state law actions for damages or injunctive relief arising from violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91216 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
found that the children did not have a substantial relationship with J.R. because, while the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151644 - 2017-09-21
found that the children did not have a substantial relationship with J.R. because, while the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151644 - 2017-09-21