Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41831 - 41840 of 68502 for did.
Search results 41831 - 41840 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a voluntary intoxication defense, claiming he was so intoxicated at the time of the murder that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35883 - 2014-09-15
a voluntary intoxication defense, claiming he was so intoxicated at the time of the murder that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35883 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
deemed to lack sufficient merit to warrant individual attention. See id. A. The trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
in many respects. Not only did he deny any sexual contact with the victim, but also he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gilles H. Glassiognon
. Glassiognon did not appear at a pretrial conference on September 7, but was represented by an assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
. Glassiognon did not appear at a pretrial conference on September 7, but was represented by an assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Fernando R. Matos
. 1987). ¶4 Matos did not want the jury to view him in his custodial status. He asked to be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4112 - 2017-09-20
. 1987). ¶4 Matos did not want the jury to view him in his custodial status. He asked to be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4112 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 49
its argument. Like the circuit court, we conclude that the appraisal panel did not understand its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168702 - 2017-09-21
its argument. Like the circuit court, we conclude that the appraisal panel did not understand its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 70
Holcomb did not meet the eligibility requirements for a lesser sentence under § 939.617(2). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173251 - 2017-09-21
Holcomb did not meet the eligibility requirements for a lesser sentence under § 939.617(2). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd Fugate
years probation, followed by extended supervision and/or probation.” Because Fugate’s counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5965 - 2017-09-19
years probation, followed by extended supervision and/or probation.” Because Fugate’s counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
was “acting strange” and did not answer Stevens’ questions. When Stevens explained to Eppis that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not understand information that should have been provided, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-15
did not understand information that should have been provided, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-15