Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41851 - 41860 of 61754 for does.
Search results 41851 - 41860 of 61754 for does.
Jody Muschinske v. Jeffrey Muschinske
Rule 809.17, Stats. [2] Even though the State did not properly preserve this issue and does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13490 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.17, Stats. [2] Even though the State did not properly preserve this issue and does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13490 - 2005-03-31
Delaine Tilleman v. Carol Tilleman
a conclusion of law does not meet the statutory requirements for creating an issue of fact that would preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2146 - 2005-03-31
a conclusion of law does not meet the statutory requirements for creating an issue of fact that would preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2146 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). Because Steckhan’s motion does not contain such facts, we conclude that Steckhan failed to make a prima
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-07-23
). Because Steckhan’s motion does not contain such facts, we conclude that Steckhan failed to make a prima
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court conducted an adequate plea colloquy, and Schultz does not assert that he misunderstood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
. The circuit court conducted an adequate plea colloquy, and Schultz does not assert that he misunderstood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
or convicted. Additionally, the evidence was previously tested, and Howard does not assert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91779 - 2014-09-15
or convicted. Additionally, the evidence was previously tested, and Howard does not assert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91779 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties.” State v. Kluck, 210 Wis. 2d 1, 7, 563 N.W.2d 468 (1997). Our recent decision in Cherry does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
of the parties.” State v. Kluck, 210 Wis. 2d 1, 7, 563 N.W.2d 468 (1997). Our recent decision in Cherry does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. However, freely does not mean automatically; a fair and just reason is an “adequate reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
. However, freely does not mean automatically; a fair and just reason is an “adequate reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Minniecheske’s notice of appeal does not specify the order or judgment appealed from. The notice of appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
Minniecheske’s notice of appeal does not specify the order or judgment appealed from. The notice of appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
(appellate court generally does not review an issue raised for the first time on appeal). Finally, contrary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93261 - 2013-02-26
(appellate court generally does not review an issue raised for the first time on appeal). Finally, contrary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93261 - 2013-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that are relevant to the offense for which the sentence is imposed, as long as the court does not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08
that are relevant to the offense for which the sentence is imposed, as long as the court does not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08