Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41871 - 41880 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
a fee … [the cost] must be chargeable and payable by another.” Id. at 242. Dismuke contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15709 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Larry Chapman v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
elsewhere. Id. This implies that Chapman was completely forthright but the record is, at best, ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6797 - 2017-09-20

City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6736 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is against the great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051125 - 2025-12-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 85. The court recognized, however, that “[t]he failure to state separate findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=429248 - 2021-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the judicial conscience or there is an evident erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54718 - 2010-09-20

[PDF] Supporting memo for Supreme Court rule petition 16-02
, 410, 579 N.W.2d 642, 651 (1998). 8 Id. at 650. 6 the party at that time to introduce
/supreme/docs/1602petitionsupport.pdf - 2016-04-20

[PDF] Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (BLOC)
% decrease. (Id.) This pattern, combined with an 4 In any event, only 21.3% of the population in BLOC’s
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrctobloc.pdf - 2022-01-04

COURT OF APPEALS
if it examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and reached a reasonable conclusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143485 - 2015-06-24

[PDF] ANR Pipeline Company v.
property exemptions granted to commercial and industrial property. Id. at 342. DOR then issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9942 - 2017-09-19