Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 82613 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] Eric M. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
2003 WI 83 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-2139 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16535 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Open rules petition conference - March 21, 2014
of Rule Petition 13-14 relating to amendment to SCR 60.04 (Judicial Code amendment regarding
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac032114.pdf - 2014-03-12

[PDF] Supreme Court open rules conference agenda, 05/27/14
of Rule Petition 13-14 relating to amendment to SCR 60.04 (Judicial Code amendment regarding
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac052714.pdf - 2014-05-20

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 0404 open.docx
of Rule Petition 13-14 relating to amendment to SCR 60.04 (Judicial Code amendment regarding
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac040414.pdf - 2014-03-24

[PDF] State v. Robert K.
¶25 Indeed, cases under the Children's Code have applied Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2) to situations like
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20325 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert K.
date.[19] ¶25 Indeed, cases under the Children's Code have applied Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20325 - 2005-11-17

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4815 - 2005-03-31

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4817 - 2005-03-31

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4816 - 2005-03-31

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We review questions of law independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4796 - 2005-03-31