Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 28806 for f.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 28806 for f.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the prior conviction. Id. at 15. We therefore concluded that “[f]urther pursuit of this issue would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
of the prior conviction. Id. at 15. We therefore concluded that “[f]urther pursuit of this issue would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be retransferred. See Bigbee v. Nalley, 482 F. Supp. 2d 1092, 1099 (W.D. Wis. 2007), citing Higgason v. Farley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169739 - 2017-09-21
to be retransferred. See Bigbee v. Nalley, 482 F. Supp. 2d 1092, 1099 (W.D. Wis. 2007), citing Higgason v. Farley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Huntington
opening statement. See United States v. Knowles, 66 F.3d 1146, 1161 (11th Cir. 1995); United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10999 - 2017-09-19
opening statement. See United States v. Knowles, 66 F.3d 1146, 1161 (11th Cir. 1995); United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10999 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the prior conviction. Id. at 15. We therefore concluded that “[f]urther pursuit of this issue would lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
of the prior conviction. Id. at 15. We therefore concluded that “[f]urther pursuit of this issue would lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
§ 973.195(1r)(f), (g). In determining whether to grant or deny a sentence adjustment petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983993 - 2025-07-16
§ 973.195(1r)(f), (g). In determining whether to grant or deny a sentence adjustment petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983993 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was that the establishments Lusk was accused of robbing— Chase Bank and Wells Fargo Bank—were “[f]inancial institution[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
was that the establishments Lusk was accused of robbing— Chase Bank and Wells Fargo Bank—were “[f]inancial institution[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
James Munroe v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, 919 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1990). While Smith may arguably provide support for Munroe’s claim, federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10557 - 2005-03-31
, 919 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1990). While Smith may arguably provide support for Munroe’s claim, federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
.” DeValkenaere testified that his specific assignment was “[t]o check the area … [f]or people running away from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35651 - 2009-02-23
.” DeValkenaere testified that his specific assignment was “[t]o check the area … [f]or people running away from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35651 - 2009-02-23