Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 68869 for he.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 68869 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report, but he has not done so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112693 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report, but he has not done so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112693 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a response, but he has not responded. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112196 - 2014-05-07
a response, but he has not responded. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112196 - 2014-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
and disorderly conduct and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jeffrey contends: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29777 - 2007-07-23
and disorderly conduct and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jeffrey contends: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29777 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case, he pled guilty to two counts of robbery with the use of force. Then, deciding his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
of the case, he pled guilty to two counts of robbery with the use of force. Then, deciding his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was based on an allegation of obstructing an officer.1 Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50756 - 2014-09-15
was based on an allegation of obstructing an officer.1 Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50756 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated (OWI). He argues the 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186565 - 2017-09-21
intoxicated (OWI). He argues the 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4183 - 2017-09-19
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4183 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of obstructing an officer.[1] Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw his no contest plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
of obstructing an officer.[1] Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw his no contest plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07