Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 7645 for yes.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 7645 for yes.
State v. Jackie C.
position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has no desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has no desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will?”; Gilmour responded, “Yes.” Gilmour expressly agreed to the facts as set forth in the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83842 - 2014-09-15
will?”; Gilmour responded, “Yes.” Gilmour expressly agreed to the facts as set forth in the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), because he gave only “perfunctory” answers (“Yes.”) to the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246135 - 2019-09-04
. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), because he gave only “perfunctory” answers (“Yes.”) to the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246135 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
bodily harm. Do you understand that? [McElroy]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
bodily harm. Do you understand that? [McElroy]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
Steven R. Passehl v. Jay Zeinert
, “Yes.” No. 04-1960-FT 5 into between twelve and twenty separate logging jobs.4 Passehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7603 - 2017-09-19
, “Yes.” No. 04-1960-FT 5 into between twelve and twenty separate logging jobs.4 Passehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7603 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Well it says that she would be eligible. I thought she wouldn’t be. It says yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
. Well it says that she would be eligible. I thought she wouldn’t be. It says yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
State v. Kim A. Dasko
?” Klipstein responded, “Yes, I guess you would have to, because otherwise we wouldn’t be here.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4340 - 2005-03-31
?” Klipstein responded, “Yes, I guess you would have to, because otherwise we wouldn’t be here.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4340 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that Watson “said ‘yes,’ and opened the door more fully so [the officers] could come in.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89201 - 2012-11-13
testified that Watson “said ‘yes,’ and opened the door more fully so [the officers] could come in.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89201 - 2012-11-13
State v. Lawrence Northern
a more detailed interview orally with officers after the plea was entered?” She answered yes. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
a more detailed interview orally with officers after the plea was entered?” She answered yes. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to object when a social worker, testifying in rebuttal to their expert witness, responded, “Yes,” when asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106959 - 2014-01-21
to object when a social worker, testifying in rebuttal to their expert witness, responded, “Yes,” when asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106959 - 2014-01-21