Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41911 - 41920 of 50514 for our.
Search results 41911 - 41920 of 50514 for our.
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
use § 893.80(1)(b), Stats., 1993-94, in our analysis. All further references will be to the 1993-94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
use § 893.80(1)(b), Stats., 1993-94, in our analysis. All further references will be to the 1993-94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie J. Hickles
discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Hickles’ arguments are without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Hickles’ arguments are without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
… does indeed have ‘personal knowledge’ of our account.” In addition, they asked “to see evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94377 - 2013-03-25
… does indeed have ‘personal knowledge’ of our account.” In addition, they asked “to see evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94377 - 2013-03-25
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
in this case would have a similar "adverse [e]ffect" on Dr. Gomilla. As we have stressed above, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
in this case would have a similar "adverse [e]ffect" on Dr. Gomilla. As we have stressed above, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as the assailant were testimonial and should have been excluded, we need only point to our statement in Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
as the assailant were testimonial and should have been excluded, we need only point to our statement in Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, a defendant is not entitled to sentence credit for such periods of home detention. Id. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775975 - 2024-03-20
. Therefore, a defendant is not entitled to sentence credit for such periods of home detention. Id. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775975 - 2024-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41748 - 2009-10-05
, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41748 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Derek E.
rather than spin our wheels in the juvenile court system. Derek does not challenge the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13319 - 2017-09-21
rather than spin our wheels in the juvenile court system. Derek does not challenge the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13319 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
recommendation and place Reese on probation and not order any jail time.” Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
recommendation and place Reese on probation and not order any jail time.” Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He presents this court with one issue for our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He presents this court with one issue for our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19