Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41931 - 41940 of 75049 for judgment for us.

Richard Winters v. Gary R. McCaughtry
; but the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7471 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Cook appeals the portion of a divorce judgment that requires Dana Matthew Cook to pay Sheila $1,150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033561 - 2025-11-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11

COURT OF APPEALS
relief from judgment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1), in which he requested a hearing to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2013-04-30

[PDF] Cheryl Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund
of Supreme Court Madison, WI Appeal from an order and judgment of the Circuit Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17088 - 2017-09-21

Cheryl Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund
Court Madison, WI Appeal from an order and judgment of the Circuit Court for Marinette
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17088 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary McKnight v. Teachers Retirement Board of Wisconsin
).1 The issue before us is whether a certification by McKnight’s former employer that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2943 - 2017-09-19

State v. David Sautier
issues on appeal largely relate to use of the PSI at sentencing and whether inaccuracies in the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
, and those matters are therefore not before us. Michael M. recognizes that he is not appealing any orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15711 - 2017-09-21