Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41931 - 41940 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 41931 - 41940 of 58245 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Hudson Diesel v. Rose Ottum
we conclude that Hudson Diesel did not satisfy the County’s objection and the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
we conclude that Hudson Diesel did not satisfy the County’s objection and the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
Hudson Diesel v. Rose Ottum
that Hudson Diesel did not satisfy the County’s objection and the trial court properly dismissed this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7175 - 2005-03-31
that Hudson Diesel did not satisfy the County’s objection and the trial court properly dismissed this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7175 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
); manufacturing or delivery of THC; and possession of drug paraphernalia. On the date of trial, a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
); manufacturing or delivery of THC; and possession of drug paraphernalia. On the date of trial, a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews independently. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34044 - 2008-09-15
that this court reviews independently. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34044 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
established at the injunction hearing. ¶3 At trial, Reynosa testified that Ross yelled at her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
established at the injunction hearing. ¶3 At trial, Reynosa testified that Ross yelled at her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
[PDF]
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline
of the parties’ marriage. The trial court excluded the affidavit as irrelevant, apparently because it was too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21
of the parties’ marriage. The trial court excluded the affidavit as irrelevant, apparently because it was too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new matter attached to an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36866 - 2014-09-15
review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new matter attached to an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
admitted to sexual intercourse with Marthaler and the trial focused on whether Marthaler consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2007-08-08
admitted to sexual intercourse with Marthaler and the trial focused on whether Marthaler consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2007-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence but not known to the trial judge at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47800 - 2010-03-10
of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence but not known to the trial judge at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47800 - 2010-03-10
State v. John D. Walker
. The trial court denied Walker’s motion to suppress the cocaine evidence. He was subsequently found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10221 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied Walker’s motion to suppress the cocaine evidence. He was subsequently found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10221 - 2005-03-31