Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41951 - 41960 of 59618 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 41951 - 41960 of 59618 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
maximum exposure was fourteen years’ imprisonment; Quiroz claims that fourteen years is inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
maximum exposure was fourteen years’ imprisonment; Quiroz claims that fourteen years is inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that WIS. STAT. § 766.70(6)(b)1. entitles a surviving spouse to claim one-half of “every possible gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140358 - 2017-09-21
that WIS. STAT. § 766.70(6)(b)1. entitles a surviving spouse to claim one-half of “every possible gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140358 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ten days. See WIS. STAT. §§ 767.27 and 767.263 (2003-04). 2 He claims that he cannot be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-15
ten days. See WIS. STAT. §§ 767.27 and 767.263 (2003-04). 2 He claims that he cannot be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sandra K.T.
of her claims and affirm. We begin with a summary of the State's evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10703 - 2005-03-31
of her claims and affirm. We begin with a summary of the State's evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10703 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leslie M. Pirk
on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, Pirk has the burden of proving the trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31
on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, Pirk has the burden of proving the trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to avoid advancing frivolous claims and offered to find a fourth attorney,[1] but warned Staffa he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
to avoid advancing frivolous claims and offered to find a fourth attorney,[1] but warned Staffa he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
Joycel v. Ruzic Construction Company
claims against the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and governmental contractors for injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3465 - 2017-09-20
claims against the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and governmental contractors for injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3465 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, “[a] fundamental element of a claim for consequential damages resulting from a breach of warranty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89344 - 2012-11-20
, “[a] fundamental element of a claim for consequential damages resulting from a breach of warranty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89344 - 2012-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17