Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41961 - 41970 of 44612 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
for his sentencing in this case. He emphasized that the report states, in part: “[t]here was a further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109089 - 2014-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
on a suppression motion under a two part standard of review: we review findings of fact under the clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04

COURT OF APPEALS
based its findings in part on: · “Dr. Tyre testified credibly and thoughtfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106277 - 2014-01-06

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
raise this issue. Our decision is based in part on the fact that the trial court never addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28573 - 2007-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
of Review ¶16 This court analyzes the denial of a suppression motion under a two-part standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120455 - 2014-08-27

COURT OF APPEALS
to the driver’s side window of a passing car, taking part in “what appeared to be a drug transaction.” Franklin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18

[PDF] Charles F. Kozlik v. Gulf Insurance Company
. App. 1996). ¶19 WISCONSIN STAT. § 807.01(4) provides in pertinent part: If there is an offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6079 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 343.307, which provides in relevant part: (1) The court shall count the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77687 - 2012-02-07

[PDF] NOTICE
Wis. 2d 544, ¶65 (criminal defendants may request a new trial in the interest of justice as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61234 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
.2d 222 (1998), wherein we applied a two-part “catalyst test” to determine whether to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12206 - 2017-09-21