Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41961 - 41970 of 63789 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
), 939.62 (1989–90). The Record does not give a reason for the reduction. Melby testified that Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29707 - 2007-07-16

COURT OF APPEALS
, Sax’s medical records, photographs of her injuries, her rebuttal testimony and the trial testimony of Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19

Tyler Dorbritz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, if it appears from the record that: (1) the real controversy has not been fully tried, or (2) it is probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18136 - 2005-07-26

[PDF] State v. Wilfred E. Tobias
-08 (1980)).2 The record indicates that Tobias's interrogation was nonthreatening. DuPlayee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
does not need a protective covering. Cunningham, however, does not show where in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111513 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
whether a prospective juror was subjectively biased, we examine “whether the record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611642 - 2023-01-18

Richard Weyenberg v. Rod Kolpien
-recorded statement demonstrates that Freeman would testify that the defendant accelerated as he approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13067 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for Brooke is not in the record, but Rowell-Gofton informs us that March 2001 is the date of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Vernon D. Fields
, the following exchange took place between the judge and Fields’ counsel: [The Court:] Let the record show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3916 - 2017-09-20

Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
judgment to an award of permanent maintenance. Because the record does not support the family court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15563 - 2005-03-31