Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41971 - 41980 of 68271 for law.

State v. Terrance Bernard Davis
. Champion, 258 Wis. 2d 781, ¶4. Whether something constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7318 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. at 496-97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30981 - 2007-11-27

COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10

State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
of the performance and prejudice prongs of Strickland is a mixed question of law and fact, and the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert K.
no “wishes” beyond what the law determines is in their best interests. When that is true, “[t]he guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken facts or an erroneous view of law. Id.; Duffy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03

County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
interpretation, the application of undisputed facts to the law, and the constitutionality of the sanitary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16098 - 2005-03-31

John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
other things, whether the board proceeded under a correct theory of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14376 - 2005-03-31

David Burch v. Village of Hammond
) the board acted according to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31

Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
the factual background and the law and adequately expresses our view of the primary issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14732 - 2005-03-31