Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 421 - 430 of 17484 for Cost.

COURT OF APPEALS
fees and costs. Schmitz contends the award is too big. Biersdorf contends the award is too small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79706 - 2012-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the costs for T.L.’s care. ¶2 We disagree with Sheboygan County, and we conclude that the County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644974 - 2023-04-18

WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92038 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] WI 10
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 10
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15

Paradise Place Associates Limited Partnership v. City of West Bend
over a ten-year period. For the year 1993, the city assessor used the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9633 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of Madison
is assessed using the cost-less-depreciation approach (the cost approach) contravenes the Uniformity Clause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25888 - 2017-09-21

Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of Madison
to assess Adams' billboards when almost all other personal property in the City is assessed using the cost
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25888 - 2006-07-12

Rashid A. Osman v. Allen R. Phipps
Company appeals from the circuit court order awarding Rashid A. Osman double costs of $1,477.10, interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3942 - 2005-03-31

State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
, the costs of meeting those obligations are not “damages” as used in the insurance policies. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24