Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 421 - 430 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 421 - 430 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Lance R. Ward
there was, that there is sufficient evidence to search the suspect’s home. In this case, the affidavit identifies one address
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17286 - 2017-09-21
there was, that there is sufficient evidence to search the suspect’s home. In this case, the affidavit identifies one address
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis E. Bermudez
items won’t be disturbed.” According to Cavalary, Lisa then consented to the search. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12241 - 2014-09-15
items won’t be disturbed.” According to Cavalary, Lisa then consented to the search. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12241 - 2014-09-15
State v. Luis E. Bermudez
then consented to the search. In this case, the intervening factors between the illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12241 - 2005-03-31
then consented to the search. In this case, the intervening factors between the illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brandon L. Wheat
2002 WI App 153 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4315 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 153 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4315 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brandon L. Wheat
2002 WI App 153 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2224-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4315 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 153 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2224-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathan T. Moore
in similar situations. From this, Moore reasons that the search in this case was more of the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7447 - 2017-09-20
in similar situations. From this, Moore reasons that the search in this case was more of the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7447 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
against unreasonable searches and seizures. The main question in this case is whether the exclusionary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52200 - 2010-07-14
against unreasonable searches and seizures. The main question in this case is whether the exclusionary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52200 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
WI 84
the search the officers conducted in this case was done in accordance with the law as declared at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52200 - 2014-09-15
the search the officers conducted in this case was done in accordance with the law as declared at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52200 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence because the search which led to the evidence underlying his convictions, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
to suppress evidence because the search which led to the evidence underlying his convictions, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
” and a probation “home search,” both in case law and in the Wisconsin Administrative Code and Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54642 - 2014-09-15
” and a probation “home search,” both in case law and in the Wisconsin Administrative Code and Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54642 - 2014-09-15