Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 421 - 430 of 9541 for jurors.
Search results 421 - 430 of 9541 for jurors.
[PDF]
State v. Ricky D. Loret
erred No. 99-0104 2 when it refused to strike a prospective juror for cause. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
erred No. 99-0104 2 when it refused to strike a prospective juror for cause. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prospective jurors were primarily referred to by numbers rather than their names. We affirm. ¶2 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677085 - 2023-07-11
prospective jurors were primarily referred to by numbers rather than their names. We affirm. ¶2 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677085 - 2023-07-11
State v. William F. Williams
, and the court’s failure to remove a juror for cause. Finally, if we conclude the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
, and the court’s failure to remove a juror for cause. Finally, if we conclude the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred during voir dire by referring to the prospective jurors by number instead of by name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90012 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court erred during voir dire by referring to the prospective jurors by number instead of by name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90012 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
malpractice. After lengthy deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Greenfield, with two jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31007 - 2007-11-28
malpractice. After lengthy deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Greenfield, with two jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31007 - 2007-11-28
State v. Jeffrey H. Bahn
, Bahn questions evidentiary rulings, contends that a juror should have been excused for bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11787 - 2005-03-31
, Bahn questions evidentiary rulings, contends that a juror should have been excused for bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawrence H. DeClerc v. Bellin Memorial Hospital
the jury answered "no," with two different jurors dissenting. On motions after verdict, the DeClercs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14793 - 2017-09-21
the jury answered "no," with two different jurors dissenting. On motions after verdict, the DeClercs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14793 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Doral Williams
the jurors as a group, asking them whether or not that constituted their verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10341 - 2017-09-20
the jurors as a group, asking them whether or not that constituted their verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10341 - 2017-09-20
State v. Anthony Doral Williams
verdict, the trial court polled the jurors as a group, asking them whether or not that constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31
verdict, the trial court polled the jurors as a group, asking them whether or not that constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Lewis Flynn
is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the jurors were exposed to extraneous and prejudicial information; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the jurors were exposed to extraneous and prejudicial information; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06