Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4201 - 4210 of 12234 for 2012.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”—related to the duty-to- defend inquiry—is not implicated. See Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶34, 338 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121167 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
not properly preserved this claim. Thus, this court will not address it.[2] See State v. Dowdy, 2012 WI 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106015 - 2013-12-26

[PDF] WI APP 26
, 2012); State v. Gerondale, Nos. 2009AP1237/1238-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 3, 2009). 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108251 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 16, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88163 - 2012-10-15

CA Blank Order
February 16, 2012, when he was sentenced for a separate offense in another county after revocation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01

CA Blank Order
arguable merit. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811 N.W.2d 411 (no manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122843 - 2014-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410. Our review is “highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215691 - 2018-07-17

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Headlines archive 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1302&year=2021